TARIFF SHOCKWAVES

A FRACTURED GLOBALIZATION — AND SURPRISING WINNERS (2017–2026)

By AI TV INFO | Global Economic Intelligence — February 20, 2026

When President Donald Trump imposed sweeping tariffs starting in 2017 and escalated them again after returning to office in 2025, the objective was to reduce U.S. trade deficits, reshore manufacturing, and confront perceived unfair trade partners.

Nearly a decade later, the measurable outcome is clear:

The tariffs changed how the world trades — but not how much it trades.

1. FIRST-ROUND TARIFFS (2017–2021): THE SHOCK

The United States applied tariffs of 10%–25% on roughly $350 billion of imports, especially from China.

Direct U.S. Economic Effects

• Average U.S. tariff rate rose from ~2.5% (2016) to ~11% by 2020, the highest in decades.

• Import prices increased almost proportionally, costing U.S. firms and consumers an estimated $70–90 billion annually.

• Studies found over 90% of tariff costs were borne domestically, not by foreign exporters.

• Manufacturing employment rose modestly (tens of thousands of jobs), far short of restoring the ~5 million jobs lost since 2000.

• Federal farm subsidies reached $28–32 billion to offset retaliatory export losses.

Conclusion: Tariffs functioned more like a tax than an industrial policy.

2. SECOND-TERM ESCALATION (2025–2026): TARIFFS AS STRATEGY

The renewed tariff wave extended beyond China to multiple countries with trade surpluses with the United States.

• Additional duties targeted sectors worth hundreds of billions of dollars in annual trade flows.

• Firms increasingly adopted “China+1” or “multi-country” sourcing models.

• Supply-chain duplication raised production costs globally by an estimated 2–6% depending on sector.

3. IMPACT ON THE GLOBAL NORTH: ALLIES CAUGHT IN THE CROSSFIRE

Canada

Trade tensions with Canada disrupted one of the world’s most integrated production zones:

• Cross-border steel and aluminum trade dropped 15–20% during peak tariff enforcement.

• Automotive supply chains — responsible for $300+ billion annually — faced delays and compliance costs.

• Business investment slowed amid uncertainty.

Europe

The European Union responded with countermeasures covering more than €20 billion of U.S. exports.

• Industrial input costs rose 3–5% in affected sectors.

• EU exports to the U.S. experienced measurable slowdowns between 2019–2022.

• Governments shifted toward subsidy-led industrial policy to protect domestic production.

Result: Rather than strengthening Western economic cohesion, tariffs strained it.

4. GLOBAL SOUTH — ASIA: TRADE DIVERSION ON A MASSIVE SCALE

Tariffs reduced China’s share of U.S. imports from ~21% (2017) to ~13–14%, but:

• China expanded exports elsewhere, maintaining a global trade surplus exceeding $1.2 trillion.

• Manufacturing shifted geographically rather than returning to the U.S.

• Southeast Asia and Mexico captured large shares of redirected investment.

Outcome: A relocation of production — not deindustrialization of Asia.

5. GLOBAL SOUTH — AFRICA & MIDDLE EAST: ADAPTATION AND SOUTH–SOUTH GROWTH

While vulnerable to global volatility, several African economies maintained strong momentum:

• A number of reform-driven economies recorded 6–7% annual growth during strong periods of the 2018–2024 cycle.

• Intra–Global South trade expanded to over 50% of developing-country exports, reflecting deeper South–South integration.

• Regional trade initiatives accelerated to reduce dependence on Western demand.

In the Middle East, energy exporters benefited from price swings:

• Hydrocarbon revenues increased fiscal inflows by tens of billions of dollars annually during high-price years.

• Asia became the destination for more than 60% of Gulf exports, reinforcing an eastward economic pivot.

WHAT HAPPENED TO THE GLOBAL TRADING SYSTEM?

The tariff era weakened the authority of the World Trade Organization, accelerating a shift away from multilateral rules toward bilateral power politics.

Dispute settlement at the WTO stalled, and major economies increasingly negotiated directly — often using tariffs as leverage rather than law.

6. DID THE TARIFFS WORK?

They worked if the goal was geopolitical signaling:

✔ Demonstrated confrontation with China
✔ Encouraged supply-chain diversification
✔ Made trade policy an instrument of national security

They backfired economically on key promises:

✘ No large-scale U.S. manufacturing renaissance
✘ Trade deficits persisted globally
✘ Costs shifted to American households and firms
✘ Alliances with Canada and Europe strained
✘ Liberal trade order weakened rather than strengthened

Most empirical research concludes tariffs produced redistribution, not regeneration.

AI TV INFO‘s FINAL ASSESSMENT: FROM GLOBALIZATION TO GEOECONOMICS

1990–2015: Trade organized around efficiency and cost minimization.
Post-2018: Trade increasingly organized around resilience, politics, and strategic alignment.

Global trade did not collapse — it slowed, fragmented, and reorganized into competing regional systems.

The President Trump‘s tariff era will likely be remembered not for reversing globalization, but for transforming it into a multipolar, state-driven economic order.

🧠📺 AI TV INFO’s Channel Is Rewriting the economic narrative Tracking the New Geoeconomic Era.

📣 Follow and subscribe AI TV INFO for positive, balanced, more intelligence beyond the headlines and future-focused global stories.

📢 PRESS CONTACT

Click➡️ Editorial team

© AI TV INFO | Global Economics
Data compiled from  Federal Reserve Reports,  Penn Wharton Budget Model (PWBM) Studies, J.P. Morgan Economic Forecasts, Tax Foundation Analysis, International Monetary Fund (IMF) Reports, World Bank Data, Japanese Ministry of Finance & Nikkei Reports, Statistics Canada & OECD, European Commission & ECB Reports, US Census Bureau & US Trade Representative (USTR), and historical economic records. Interpretive analysis by AI TV INFO´s channel.

AI TV INFO is not an investment advisor, broker, or dealer.
The information presented in this report is for informational and educational purposes only and does not constitute investment advice, a recommendation, or an offer to buy or sell any securities or financial instruments.

All investing involves risk, in both developed and emerging markets. Regional political, economic, regulatory, and currency factors should be carefully considered.

To invest responsibly in these markets, it is recommended to identify a trustworthy partner with aligned long-term interests, who is successfully active on the ground in these regions and who does not rely on commissions or product sales for compensation. Independent alignment, local expertise, and transparency are critical when navigating opportunities in the Global South.